<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Francis Hall, 1 - On the science of Theology</title>
	<link>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/05/02/francis-hall-1-on-the-science-of-theology/</link>
	<description>Catholic Anglican Reflections on Theology and Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[Janet leslie Blumberg]]></title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/05/02/francis-hall-1-on-the-science-of-theology/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janet leslie Blumberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/05/02/francis-hall-1-on-the-science-of-theology/#comment-99</guid>
		<description>Sorry, if you got my note about your web address, it was my mistake. There isn't a problem with it.  9I don't recall which link it was on Williams.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, if you got my note about your web address, it was my mistake. There isn&#8217;t a problem with it.  9I don&#8217;t recall which link it was on Williams.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[D. W. McClain]]></title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/05/02/francis-hall-1-on-the-science-of-theology/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D. W. McClain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 11:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/05/02/francis-hall-1-on-the-science-of-theology/#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Janet, thanks much for the kind words. von Balthasar is really a treat to read, at first glance because his scope is so catholic. Aron's summation of our reading captures nicely the level of discourse vB is maintaining - probably a good clue as to why he captures the minds of so many like Williams, Ratzinger, Schindler, etc.. btw, which link did you follow to find the info about Williams?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janet, thanks much for the kind words. von Balthasar is really a treat to read, at first glance because his scope is so catholic. Aron&#8217;s summation of our reading captures nicely the level of discourse vB is maintaining - probably a good clue as to why he captures the minds of so many like Williams, Ratzinger, Schindler, etc.. btw, which link did you follow to find the info about Williams?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[Janet leslie Blumberg]]></title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/05/02/francis-hall-1-on-the-science-of-theology/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janet leslie Blumberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 06:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/05/02/francis-hall-1-on-the-science-of-theology/#comment-97</guid>
		<description>Good idea to read Hall from the beginning. With H von Balthazer, you're already on vol. 5... I enjoyed the earlier Rowan Williams post, too. Your wenlog has excellent links and visiting them I learned that Rowan Williams was a student of von Balthazer, about whom I know less than I'd like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea to read Hall from the beginning. With H von Balthazer, you&#8217;re already on vol. 5&#8230; I enjoyed the earlier Rowan Williams post, too. Your wenlog has excellent links and visiting them I learned that Rowan Williams was a student of von Balthazer, about whom I know less than I&#8217;d like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
