Comments on: R. R. Reno on the "Heroic Generation" and Theological Education http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/05/02/r-r-reno-on-the-heroic-generation-and-theological-education/ Catholic Anglican Reflections on Theology and Culture Thu, 04 Dec 2008 07:55:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Neo-scholasticism and Reno, redux | The Land of Unlikeness http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/05/02/r-r-reno-on-the-heroic-generation-and-theological-education/#comment-174 Neo-scholasticism and Reno, redux | The Land of Unlikeness Thu, 02 Aug 2007 13:03:00 +0000 http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/05/02/r-r-reno-on-the-heroic-generation-and-theological-education/#comment-174 [...] if I didn’t have them emailed to me - and I would hate to see it forgotten. Go here and here for the original posts. I hope Tony, the author of it, won’t mind me posting a snippet of it [...] if I didn’t have them emailed to me - and I would hate to see it forgotten. Go here and here for the original posts. I hope Tony, the author of it, won’t mind me posting a snippet of it …

]]> By: <![CDATA[D. W. McClain]]> http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/05/02/r-r-reno-on-the-heroic-generation-and-theological-education/#comment-101 Wed, 02 May 2007 23:16:00 +0000 http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/05/02/r-r-reno-on-the-heroic-generation-and-theological-education/#comment-101 Scott, that's a great question. I wonder why he doesn't look at Gilson, or rather, I wonder if he does. Reno doesn't mention it. Another reason to get the book. Scott, that’s a great question. I wonder why he doesn’t look at Gilson, or rather, I wonder if he does. Reno doesn’t mention it. Another reason to get the book.

]]> By: <![CDATA[mutabilitie]]> http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/05/02/r-r-reno-on-the-heroic-generation-and-theological-education/#comment-100 Wed, 02 May 2007 22:56:00 +0000 http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/05/02/r-r-reno-on-the-heroic-generation-and-theological-education/#comment-100 I noticed Gilson wasn't mentioned here. Does Kerr discuss his influence? That would speak to all the Thomists who wanted to be like Heidegger but didn't want to be Rahner.<br/><br/>Besides, we all know that Henry of Ghent, not Aquinas, was the theologian who made theology overcome metaphysics by 'disrupting' metaphysics as a sufficient voice for its own subject matter. See my forthcoming book published by Brill. :o> I noticed Gilson wasn’t mentioned here. Does Kerr discuss his influence? That would speak to all the Thomists who wanted to be like Heidegger but didn’t want to be Rahner.

Besides, we all know that Henry of Ghent, not Aquinas, was the theologian who made theology overcome metaphysics by ‘disrupting’ metaphysics as a sufficient voice for its own subject matter. See my forthcoming book published by Brill. :o>

]]>