<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three Views of the Eucharist? (Eventual) ruminations on the place of the Eucharist in Anglican theology</title>
	<link>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/05/13/three-views-of-the-eucharist-eventual-ruminations-on-the-place-of-the-eucharist-in-anglican-theology/</link>
	<description>Catholic Anglican Reflections on Theology and Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[Davis]]></title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/05/13/three-views-of-the-eucharist-eventual-ruminations-on-the-place-of-the-eucharist-in-anglican-theology/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 14:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/05/13/three-views-of-the-eucharist-eventual-ruminations-on-the-place-of-the-eucharist-in-anglican-theology/#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Well I can think of at least half a dozen views on the Eucharist and Cranmer's was strongly influenced by continental reformers. Still, the "real presence" is clearly upheld by the Articles of Religion - just hedging on what "real" means. IMHO that's a good thing allowing for plenty of latitude in personal belief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I can think of at least half a dozen views on the Eucharist and Cranmer&#8217;s was strongly influenced by continental reformers. Still, the &#8220;real presence&#8221; is clearly upheld by the Articles of Religion - just hedging on what &#8220;real&#8221; means. IMHO that&#8217;s a good thing allowing for plenty of latitude in personal belief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
