Comments on: John Henry Newman http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/08/23/john-henry-newman/ Catholic Anglican Reflections on Theology and Culture Sun, 11 Jul 2010 19:17:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 By: Davis http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/08/23/john-henry-newman/comment-page-1/#comment-262 Davis Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:37:05 +0000 http://thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/08/23/john-henry-newman/#comment-262 Newman's conversion, though heartfelt, wasn't a "happy thing" for him and he was deeply disappointed by the late papal pronouncements on Infallibility and the Immaculate Conception, though he felt duty bound to defend them. He's very close now to be canonised which is a great thing. Keble is the one I'd look to and of course Farrer. Newman’s conversion, though heartfelt, wasn’t a “happy thing” for him and he was deeply disappointed by the late papal pronouncements on Infallibility and the Immaculate Conception, though he felt duty bound to defend them. He’s very close now to be canonised which is a great thing.

Keble is the one I’d look to and of course Farrer.

]]> By: DWM http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/08/23/john-henry-newman/comment-page-1/#comment-261 DWM Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:18:42 +0000 http://thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/08/23/john-henry-newman/#comment-261 Book in the flesh or not, you can always go to <a href="http://anglicanhistory.org/hooker/index.html" rel="nofollow">Project Canterbury for Hooker and Anglican co.</a> Book in the flesh or not, you can always go to Project Canterbury for Hooker and Anglican co.

]]> By: Scott http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/08/23/john-henry-newman/comment-page-1/#comment-259 Scott Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:22:31 +0000 http://thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/08/23/john-henry-newman/#comment-259 I'm in the same boat as you: would like to read Newman, et alii, once I get the time. I was happy to find, in unpacking and shelving all my books yesterday, that I have a copy of Hooker's Ecc. Laws. SO I at least have no excuse about a necessary condition for reading him. :o) The development of doctrine is indeed such a crucial question, as it seems to suppose a certain understanding of the kind of knowledge that the Church can find or achieve through its life and work in Christ. One issue, of course, was the church's understanding of Mary and how to construe her role for the life of all believers. I’m in the same boat as you: would like to read Newman, et alii, once I get the time. I was happy to find, in unpacking and shelving all my books yesterday, that I have a copy of Hooker’s Ecc. Laws. SO I at least have no excuse about a necessary condition for reading him. :o)

The development of doctrine is indeed such a crucial question, as it seems to suppose a certain understanding of the kind of knowledge that the Church can find or achieve through its life and work in Christ. One issue, of course, was the church’s understanding of Mary and how to construe her role for the life of all believers.

]]>