<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Henri de Lubac &#8220;On Christian Philosophy&#8221;, part 3</title>
	<link>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/09/03/henri-de-lubac-on-christian-philosophy-part-3/</link>
	<description>Catholic Anglican Reflections on Theology and Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: presuppositions in Christian philosophy and Trinity dogma - Dogpile Web Search</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/09/03/henri-de-lubac-on-christian-philosophy-part-3/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>presuppositions in Christian philosophy and Trinity dogma - Dogpile Web Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 03:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/09/03/henri-de-lubac-on-christian-philosophy-part-3/#comment-683</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...]       www.bible.ca/trinity/trinity-pagan.htm   &#38;#149 Found on Windows Live, Yahoo! Search     Henri de Lubac “On Christian Philosophy”, part 3 at The Land of ...    ... article “On Christian Philosophy ... thing as Christian philosophy to exist, it must [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer"><img src="http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[&#8230;]       <a href="http://www.bible.ca/trinity/trinity-pagan.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.bible.ca/trinity/trinity-pagan.htm</a>   &amp;#149 Found on Windows Live, Yahoo! Search     Henri de Lubac “On Christian Philosophy”, part 3 at The Land of &#8230;    &#8230; article “On Christian Philosophy &#8230; thing as Christian philosophy to exist, it must [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/09/03/henri-de-lubac-on-christian-philosophy-part-3/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 12:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/09/03/henri-de-lubac-on-christian-philosophy-part-3/#comment-289</guid>
		<description>That's 'Aquinas on the other hand, does not seem to allow...'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s &#8216;Aquinas on the other hand, does not seem to allow&#8230;&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/09/03/henri-de-lubac-on-christian-philosophy-part-3/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 12:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/09/03/henri-de-lubac-on-christian-philosophy-part-3/#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Forgive my lack of historical sensitivities, but this sounds like an affirmation of Henry of Ghent's acct. of philosophy's relations to theology, and _not_ Thomas Aquinas's. The former uses a certain Christian doctrine by which to better understand a certain object of philosophy (aristotelian categories), and so 'augments'/'alters' what the philosopher understands. Aquinas on the other hand, does seem to allow some Christian doctrine to over-ride what natural reason might conclude about this object of philosophical inquiry (Aristotelian categories). The doctrine in question here is nothing less that their metaphysical expositions of the Trinity. But even more broadly, this is  a question of the 'sub-alternation' of one discipline (philosophy) to another (theology). A topic Aquinas and Henry discusses in ST 1 and Henry in SQO 7. I think Stephen Brown has an article on Henry's position as rejection of Aquinas's, and then some earlier Thomists' reply against Henry in defense of Aquinas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive my lack of historical sensitivities, but this sounds like an affirmation of Henry of Ghent&#8217;s acct. of philosophy&#8217;s relations to theology, and _not_ Thomas Aquinas&#8217;s. The former uses a certain Christian doctrine by which to better understand a certain object of philosophy (aristotelian categories), and so &#8216;augments&#8217;/'alters&#8217; what the philosopher understands. Aquinas on the other hand, does seem to allow some Christian doctrine to over-ride what natural reason might conclude about this object of philosophical inquiry (Aristotelian categories). The doctrine in question here is nothing less that their metaphysical expositions of the Trinity. But even more broadly, this is  a question of the &#8217;sub-alternation&#8217; of one discipline (philosophy) to another (theology). A topic Aquinas and Henry discusses in ST 1 and Henry in SQO 7. I think Stephen Brown has an article on Henry&#8217;s position as rejection of Aquinas&#8217;s, and then some earlier Thomists&#8217; reply against Henry in defense of Aquinas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brendan back from Italy</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/09/03/henri-de-lubac-on-christian-philosophy-part-3/#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>brendan back from Italy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/09/03/henri-de-lubac-on-christian-philosophy-part-3/#comment-284</guid>
		<description>Was it Selson Blus?.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was it Selson Blus?&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brendan in Italy</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/09/03/henri-de-lubac-on-christian-philosophy-part-3/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>brendan in Italy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/09/03/henri-de-lubac-on-christian-philosophy-part-3/#comment-283</guid>
		<description>"My head's tingling (hurting)....that means it's working!"  as the Selson Blue commercials so convincingly used to say....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;My head&#8217;s tingling (hurting)&#8230;.that means it&#8217;s working!&#8221;  as the Selson Blue commercials so convincingly used to say&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Missions</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/09/03/henri-de-lubac-on-christian-philosophy-part-3/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Missions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 04:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2007/09/03/henri-de-lubac-on-christian-philosophy-part-3/#comment-281</guid>
		<description>That really makes my head hurt ...but still very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That really makes my head hurt &#8230;but still very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
