The movie begins with us inside the voice of the old, soon to retire sheriff, and though ostensibly the action occurs elsewhere, we realize at the end of the film that we’ve never left this voice, in fact we’ve fallen deeper into its Texan cracks, even into its dreams. How do we know this? We know this because, like a sheriff, and unlike a movie, we miss most of the action. Sure, we come upon it in anticipation, but most of the killings are (literally) veiled from our eyes. We can’t figure out who the heroes are because they keep dying in very anticlimactic ways, right before, or right after, our attention has been called. I’m so excited that a filmmaker (two even!) have resurrected the art of “not showing”–Hitchcock definitely had that one down, as did many others, though perhaps in part out of regard for the censors. Well the censors have mostly gone home, but the viewers remain, and No Country for Old Men is described as a “violent” film or one that is “action packed,” but these lines come from censors who were once viewers. The truth is that the film simply shows us what it’s like to be an old man who is too slow, too peaceful, and too intelligent, for the world of terror.
Welcome
The Land of Unlikeness is an east coast team effort of Catholic Anglicans who really like theology and the Church, but tend to dabble in art, literature, and blogging to the detriment of their academic endeavours. if you're interested in learning more about us or collaborating (even if you're not on the east coast, or Anglican for that matter), click here for details.
Dostoevsky: Language, Faith + Fiction by Rowan Williams
Asides
RSSnew tune now available.
Come By My Side . mp3 (right click to download)
A burgeoning catalog of our tunes can be found on our Audiography page.
(0)The Anglican Scotist directs our attention to Optimus Prime’s piercing critique of the GAFCON document and its attack on the Anglican Covenant, found at the Rev. Canon Kendall Harmon’s excellent blog. OP makes the especially perceptive point that the Covenant is not in itself a “fix” for current problems, but rather an something like an prolegomena or architecture for how churches in the communion relate to one another. It’s subtle but extremely important re: our expectations.
ADDITIONALLY: a link offered by 3rd Mill. Catholic analyzing the GAFCON.
(0)Links
Anglicanism
- AKMA/Disseminary
- Anglican Centrist
- AngloCatholic Socialism
- Audacious Deviant
- Catholic in the Third Millennium
- Ekklesia
- Gooddust
- Haligweorc
- Institute for Theology, Imagination & the Arts
- International Anglican Roman Catholic Commission for Unity and Mission
- Per Caritatem
- Project Canterbury
- St. Andrews Church Stamford, CT
- St. Marks Church, Locust Street
- The Anglican Communion
- The Anglican Scotist
- The Archbishop of Canterbury
- The Church of the Triune God: The Cyprus Agreed Statement
- The Daily Office
- The Newman Reader
- Thinking Anglicans UK
- TitusOneNine
Theology and other
- Books and Culture Magazine
- Centre for Theology and Philosophy
- Communio ICR
- Deep Grace of Theory
- Faith and Theology
- First Things
- Generous Orthodoxy: RIP
- Image Journal
- Indie Faith: A Social and Theological Cartography
- Inhabitatio Dei
- Ipsum Esse
- Khanya
- KyleDavidBennett
- La Perruque
- Millinerd
- Per Caritatem
- Per Crucem ad Lucem
- Sacra Doctrina
- The Ekklesia Project
- The Fire and the Rose
- The Other Journal
- The Well at the World’s End
- Theolog
- Vox Nova
Can’t find what you’re looking for?
We don't currently use a monthly archive on our main page. Try using the search box (below) or take a look at our Archive page.Search here
Latest Comments
RSS- matslacker on the post An ill-formed Primer on “practice” in the work of Alasdair MacIntyre
- Janet Leslie Blumberg on the post An ill-formed Primer on “practice” in the work of Alasdair MacIntyre
- Janet Leslie Blumberg on the post An ill-formed Primer on “practice” in the work of Alasdair MacIntyre
- Andrea Elizabeth on the post An ill-formed Primer on “practice” in the work of Alasdair MacIntyre
- Scott on the post An ill-formed Primer on “practice” in the work of Alasdair MacIntyre
- Janet Leslie Blumberg on the post An ill-formed Primer on “practice” in the work of Alasdair MacIntyre
- matslacker on the post An ill-formed Primer on “practice” in the work of Alasdair MacIntyre
- Dan on the post Revolution, Paradox, and the Christian Tradition: A Chestertonian Debate between John Milbank and Slavoj Zizek.
- matslacker on the post Revolution, Paradox, and the Christian Tradition: A Chestertonian Debate between John Milbank and Slavoj Zizek.
Latest Posts
RSS- An ill-formed Primer on “practice” in the work of Alasdair MacIntyre
- Revolution, Paradox, and the Christian Tradition: A Chestertonian Debate between John Milbank and Slavoj Zizek.
- AAR, Literary Theory and the Bible
- Bulgakov Blog Conference, Day 14 - FINAL POST
- Bulgakov Blog Conference, Day 13
- Bulgakov Blog Conference, Day 12
TLOU is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
Wow. Great review.
Guess I’ll have to watch it after all. Drats! (Do I have to watch Will Be Blood, too?)
There’s something archetypal in that pit-bull terrier scene shown in the trailers for No Country. These are the (not-so)guilty nightmare desires of our current specular world, the world we “view” everywhere on all these screens that we throw up to mirror us. We must have a haunting sense of our own bad faith. What would Lacan say…
I can’t think of where the terriers come in . . . but I can say that No Country is a much better flic than There will be blood, which i thought was over hyped and, as usual, Daniel Day-Lewis out acted everyone else so much that it comes out lopsided
This blog used to be such a positive place…
Well, while I haven’t seen There will be blood, I did hear the interview on Terry Gross with the Paul Dano (Eli Sunday). The clips she played really highlighted how vibrant he was, at least in those clips. Do you feel that those scenes, like Eli making Plainview confess, were so lopsided? And why are you such a playa-hata?
It’s when the dog goes after what’s-his-name in the river. The actor told Terry Gross that he was terrified and that the dog was the “Javier Bardem” of the dog world…. Or the “Anton Chigurh” of the dog world. Everyone was yelling “Don’t worry, it’s okay….” I’ve only seen the mesmerizing clip.
As for Day-Lewis, I was sort of hoping for Viggo — that was a great scene in the bath house in Eastern Promises — until I saw the clip from There Will Be Blood at the Oscars, and I knew that no-one else stood a chance.
So Dan, you liked Blood?
Can’t say - haven’t seen either film. Have a feeling, knowing the directors from each, that I’ll like both. It’s a good feeling. Better than the cultured despair to which Aron seems so attached.
But this happened in Gangs of New York as well, in which Mr. Day-Lewis was phenomenal but the rest of the cast just stunk it up. I really think people idolize his acting too much and don’t know how to integrate him into the film. And besides PT Anderson has still not gotten rid of his pretentiousness. . . PT Barnum more like
Apparently my comment about cultured despair was inaccurate. I think something else is called for, something akin to what Schliermacher called “cultured despising“.
I do not despise this website. Nice!