<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Satire and Sufficiency</title>
	<link>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/05/08/satire-and-sufficiency/</link>
	<description>Catholic Anglican Reflections on Theology and Culture</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 04:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Janet Leslie Blumberg</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/05/08/satire-and-sufficiency/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Leslie Blumberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 23:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/05/08/satire-and-sufficiency/#comment-603</guid>
		<description>What's the matter with me today!  I mean DAN's thesis, of course.  Okay, I'm logging off now....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the matter with me today!  I mean DAN&#8217;s thesis, of course.  Okay, I&#8217;m logging off now&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Leslie Blumberg</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/05/08/satire-and-sufficiency/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Leslie Blumberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 23:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/05/08/satire-and-sufficiency/#comment-600</guid>
		<description>Scott, I actually think your thesis about the Consolatio is quite subtle and very interesting. I'll read with interest! (No wonder you thought the lady was a tart....)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, I actually think your thesis about the Consolatio is quite subtle and very interesting. I&#8217;ll read with interest! (No wonder you thought the lady was a tart&#8230;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWM</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/05/08/satire-and-sufficiency/#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>DWM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 18:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/05/08/satire-and-sufficiency/#comment-598</guid>
		<description>Scott, to grasp the significance of the Consolation, as I'm proposing, one needs to understand the satirical import of the Menippean format, which is the topic of part II. You'll have to wait until tomorrow.
Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, to grasp the significance of the Consolation, as I&#8217;m proposing, one needs to understand the satirical import of the Menippean format, which is the topic of part II. You&#8217;ll have to wait until tomorrow.<br />
Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/05/08/satire-and-sufficiency/#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 04:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/05/08/satire-and-sufficiency/#comment-597</guid>
		<description>I'd be curious to know what the proposed 'commentary tradition' is that some thinks the CoP could fit into? The general falls outside his commentary on Porphyry's Isagoge, or his work on Aristotle's Organon. This is why I think he's appropriating something from Plato, rather than Aristotle here, if he is appropriating anything.

When I read CoP in college I was under the impression that Boethius thought highly of Philosophy b/c of all the muses, he opts for Lady Philosophy, and not something like Lady Wisdom from Proverbs. It is hard to find much of any Biblical references. My guess at the time was that Boethius wanted to see what he could figure out, rather than begin and end with the conclusions of theology. If B. is in prison and thinking about his near-death, why isn't he taking a more explicitly theological tact. To my mind, he was writing/acting more like Socrates and less like ... St. Paul, or St. John. Nevertheless, we can 'say' B. was a Christian on the basis of his theological treatises. His On the Trinity was ALSO passed on to the Middle Ages--to the theologians; it is just that his On the Trinity is a technical piece and less an 'existential one' like CoP, which is one reason why so many more medievals read it--they didn't have to bother with Aristotle and his categories much (which is what gets discussed in his On the Trinity).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be curious to know what the proposed &#8216;commentary tradition&#8217; is that some thinks the CoP could fit into? The general falls outside his commentary on Porphyry&#8217;s Isagoge, or his work on Aristotle&#8217;s Organon. This is why I think he&#8217;s appropriating something from Plato, rather than Aristotle here, if he is appropriating anything.</p>
<p>When I read CoP in college I was under the impression that Boethius thought highly of Philosophy b/c of all the muses, he opts for Lady Philosophy, and not something like Lady Wisdom from Proverbs. It is hard to find much of any Biblical references. My guess at the time was that Boethius wanted to see what he could figure out, rather than begin and end with the conclusions of theology. If B. is in prison and thinking about his near-death, why isn&#8217;t he taking a more explicitly theological tact. To my mind, he was writing/acting more like Socrates and less like &#8230; St. Paul, or St. John. Nevertheless, we can &#8217;say&#8217; B. was a Christian on the basis of his theological treatises. His On the Trinity was ALSO passed on to the Middle Ages&#8211;to the theologians; it is just that his On the Trinity is a technical piece and less an &#8216;existential one&#8217; like CoP, which is one reason why so many more medievals read it&#8211;they didn&#8217;t have to bother with Aristotle and his categories much (which is what gets discussed in his On the Trinity).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/05/08/satire-and-sufficiency/#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 17:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/05/08/satire-and-sufficiency/#comment-595</guid>
		<description>I don't agree with Janet and Cynthia that Boethius regards Philosophia and Sophia to be the same damsel. A lot of this has to do with how we construe Boethius' use of form in his consolatio. If it's only a consolatio, the Janet and Cynthia are right - Philosophia does really set Boethius straight. But, if my proposal is correct, then Boethius is practicing a subtle subversion of Philosophia and her sufficiency to lead him to a grasp of the good, which she never does if you read the Consolation closely. Boethius, the Christian, realizes that the good encompasses more than a contemplative grasp of God's unity. It also has to do with the beatific vision of the Trinity. but I'm getting ahead of myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t agree with Janet and Cynthia that Boethius regards Philosophia and Sophia to be the same damsel. A lot of this has to do with how we construe Boethius&#8217; use of form in his consolatio. If it&#8217;s only a consolatio, the Janet and Cynthia are right - Philosophia does really set Boethius straight. But, if my proposal is correct, then Boethius is practicing a subtle subversion of Philosophia and her sufficiency to lead him to a grasp of the good, which she never does if you read the Consolation closely. Boethius, the Christian, realizes that the good encompasses more than a contemplative grasp of God&#8217;s unity. It also has to do with the beatific vision of the Trinity. but I&#8217;m getting ahead of myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/05/08/satire-and-sufficiency/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>A.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 17:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/05/08/satire-and-sufficiency/#comment-594</guid>
		<description>What about Sophia and the Lady?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Sophia and the Lady?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/05/08/satire-and-sufficiency/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 23:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/05/08/satire-and-sufficiency/#comment-592</guid>
		<description>Ignatius J. Reilly would be proud! I think I saw something on this topic in the margin of one of his Big Chief tablets...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ignatius J. Reilly would be proud! I think I saw something on this topic in the margin of one of his Big Chief tablets&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
