http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/10/18/bulgakov-blog-conference-day-11/ Catholic Anglican Reflections on Theology and Culture Sun, 11 Jul 2010 19:17:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/10/18/bulgakov-blog-conference-day-11/comment-page-1/#comment-799 Scott Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:14:32 +0000 http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/10/18/bulgakov-blog-conference-day-11/#comment-799 Oh, wait. Nevermind, I've found the post with the goods. Oh, wait. Nevermind, I’ve found the post with the goods.

]]> http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/10/18/bulgakov-blog-conference-day-11/comment-page-1/#comment-796 Scott Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:48:06 +0000 http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/10/18/bulgakov-blog-conference-day-11/#comment-796 Can anyone give me a brief description of what 'sophiology' studies? And, why suppose that Aquinas is the representative of scholastic theology, or even scholastic Augustinian theology? I guess it depends if we're making a historical claim --as things stood in the 13th/14th centuries, or as things stand now. Aquinas for example, is not nearly as 'Augustinian' as e.g., Peter John Olivi. But hey-- I guess it depends on which history book we're reading. All scholars are dependent on other scholars, after all. Can anyone give me a brief description of what ‘sophiology’ studies? And, why suppose that Aquinas is the representative of scholastic theology, or even scholastic Augustinian theology? I guess it depends if we’re making a historical claim –as things stood in the 13th/14th centuries, or as things stand now. Aquinas for example, is not nearly as ‘Augustinian’ as e.g., Peter John Olivi. But hey– I guess it depends on which history book we’re reading. All scholars are dependent on other scholars, after all.

]]>