<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AAR, Literary Theory and the Bible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/11/08/aar-literary-theory-and-the-bible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/11/08/aar-literary-theory-and-the-bible/</link>
	<description>Catholic Anglican Reflections on Theology and Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 19:17:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bible Online</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/11/08/aar-literary-theory-and-the-bible/comment-page-1/#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator>Bible Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/11/08/aar-literary-theory-and-the-bible/#comment-1067</guid>
		<description>Nice post, very informative.  Keep going with your great blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, very informative.  Keep going with your great blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/11/08/aar-literary-theory-and-the-bible/comment-page-1/#comment-939</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelandofunlikeness.com/2008/11/08/aar-literary-theory-and-the-bible/#comment-939</guid>
		<description>Hey Dan,

Glad to hear that you&#039;ve been doing Patristics stuff. The &#039;regula fidei&#039; is a really interesting issue. I too have been reading around; have you seen JND Kelly&#039;s _Early Christian Creeds_? It is a classic; with tons of goodies in it. It is not the same as his _Early Christian Documents book_.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dan,</p>
<p>Glad to hear that you&#8217;ve been doing Patristics stuff. The &#8216;regula fidei&#8217; is a really interesting issue. I too have been reading around; have you seen JND Kelly&#8217;s _Early Christian Creeds_? It is a classic; with tons of goodies in it. It is not the same as his _Early Christian Documents book_.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

